Tag Archives: self-education



What's New in Science and Research?  How can Non-Scientists Find Out?   (http://dr-monsrs.net)
What’s New in Science and Research?  Where should Non-Scientists Look forThis?   (http://dr-monsrs.net)


If general readers want to keep up with research progress and current science events, there are numerous websites available on the internet.  Some even are updated daily with new material, but this is not what general readers require.  Non-scientists need articles, illustrations, and videos that are readily comprehensible, and present a brief overview rather than a long comprehensive review.  That audience is looking for brief illustrated explanations and summaries that serve as background or starting points for seeking further information.

I have recently discussed “How Can I Take the First Step to Learn About Science?” (see:    http://dr-monsrs.net/2014/12/05/how-can-i-take-the-first-step-to-learn-about-science/ ).  Here, I give my selection of just a few recommended websites covering almost everything in modern scientific research, along with my comments for each.  I believe these sources for information and learning stand out from many others.  Later, I will try to gather some recommendations for more specialized areas of science. 

If you are looking for information that is about techniques, amusing, detailed,  highly specific, promising some speculative bonanza, theoretical, unbelievable, or, unsupported by research results, then please look elsewhere! 

General Science

Covering all of science is particularly difficult since the number of smaller branches in each major division (biology/medicine, chemistry, physics) is indeed very large.  However, it is easy to recommend your first attention to the prominent weekly science journals, Science (http://www.sciencemag.org ), and Nature ( http://www.nature.com/news/index.html  ).  Both report on all parts of global science, as well as its interactions with society, governments, and industry.  Coverages in these prestigious journals are somewhat similar, but each has a different flavor.  You need not read both, so initially try each one to see which you prefer.  Many scientists read them every week to try to keep up with progress, controversies, and problems, or to learn about new job openings.  Readers who are not doctoral scientists should start by looking at their News sections, whose reports are comprehensible to all.  Their search boxes are easy to use, and typically yield many informative materials. 

Two long-standing magazines do a good job in presenting a large variety of reports about important current experimental research and the development of new technology: Popular Science ( http://www.popsci.com ), and Scientific American (http://www.scientificamerican.com ).  Most articles in both are designed to be fully understood by anyone in the public, and cover many different aspects of science.  They are widely read and studied by young people interested to learn about science and research.  The reports in Popular Science are more numerous and shorter, while those in Scientific American are fewer and longer.  Both present many explanatory illustrations, and are recommended for general readers. 

Major Branches of Science: Physics

The American Institute of Physics has several excellent websites, including one for their outstanding monthly journal, Physics Today (http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/magazine/physicstoday/issues ).  This journal wonderfully covers all parts of modern physics, including research advances, controversies, policy issues, funding, and education.  I recommend Physics Today for readers with a general interest directed towards the physical sciences.  

Major Branches of Science: Biology and Medicine

Biological Science is so extremely diverse and spread out that it is completely unthinkable that any one source could even try to cover everything.  Accordingly, at present I am not able to recommend any single source for general readers; I will make a few recommendations for some of the larger specialized areas in biology and medicine at a later time.  

Major Branches of Science: Chemistry

News and materials about chemistry suited for general readers are readily available on several different websites.  For non-scientists, I recommend the long-standing weekly journal from the American Chemical Society, Chemical and Engineering News ( http://cen.acs.org/index.html ).  This presents important news about research, technology, controversies, and chemists.  It covers all the different aspects of chemistry with some emphasis on applied research, and is recommended for general readers whose interest is focused on chemistry.    

Concluding Remarks

It is my hope that these recommendations will be useful for all non-scientists interested in starting to learn about new developments in modern science.  My intention here is that these will serve as entry points for your interests and curiosity.  Use of my recommended sources should save much time for those who have been simply entering some term into the search box of any browser, and then are overwhelmed by being confronted with many dozens of different internet sites to check out.   



                                                            UNDER THE WEBSITE TITLE



Science marches on, even though very many people are unaware!!   (http://dr-monsrs.net)
Science marches on, even though many people are unaware!!   (http://dr-monsrs.net)


Let’s say that you are 34 years old and a perfectly good adult who draws a complete blank when wondering what science and research are all about.  Even though you passed all the required science courses in school, you view scientific research as something of no concern to you, and scientists as weird creatures from another planet.

Right now, you are.fascinated hy the idea that asteroids might be harvested for their contents by some sort of rocket ship.  Many different questions pop into your mind, including: what are asteroids, how big are they, what do they weigh, what are they made of, do they contain gold and silver, are they radioactive, where are they found, do they have orbits, how fast do they move, do they ever crash into our Earth, are they dangerous to humans, etc.?  You have read Dr.M’s basic introduction to science and research (see “Fundamentals for Beginners: What is Science?  What is Research?  What are Scientists?” ), but you just do not see how this fits into asteroids.

These are all good questions, and scientific research already has discovered the answers to most of them!  You want to find answers to your questions, but do not know where to look.  This short dispatch is just for you!  I will describe below a simple general sequence of first steps for you to find out about science studies on asteroids, or about any other subject of your personal interest.  All that is required is that you have curiosity, access to the internet, and a little time; if you do not have your own computer, you can use one at the nearest public library.

A general sequence to find out about science for some subject of interest

(1)  First, identify only one subject, topic, question, or controversy that has your personal interest (e.g., asteroids, global warming, gravity, nanostructures, some disease that had killed your brother when he was 29 years old, etc., etc.).  This serves to focus your initial search onto a single subject. 

(2)    Second, search on the internet for your subject on one of the Wiki’s (i.e., direct your browser to Wikipedia, Metapedia, or any other large encyclopedia-type site); then enter the name of your subject in their search box and press return.  This will display some sites covering general information for your designated subject (e.g., basic definitions, occurrence, origin, activities and effects, relationships, etc.), along with a few pictures and diagrams).  Pick only 2 or 3 of these listed sites for your reading and study.  This step furnishes you with an overview of the nature of your selected subject, and usually will be a good introduction.

(3)    Third, identify which branches of science investigate your subject (e.g., asteroids fit into both astronomy and minerology; global warming fits into meteorology, oceanography, and physics; gravity fits into physics; nanostructures fits into chemistry and materials science; human diseases fit into medicine and pathology; etc.).  Now, search either on a Wiki or on the internet for only one or 2 additional articles dealing in a general way with scientific studies of your subject (i.e., search for “astronomy +asteroids” or “minerology +asteroids”; for global warming, search for “meteorology +global-warming” or “oceanography +global-warming”; etc.).  Try to find something showing and explaining what scientists have investigated about your subject and how they did their work.  Now you have broken through your barrier!  This third step lets you begin to learn as much as you wish to know about how scientists have worked to answer your questions through their research studies.

Go one step further for additional understanding

Although you now should have a good background, you still are missing knowledge about  the individual scientists researching your subject of interest.  Your understanding will be increased if you know a little about these persons.  Good places to start looking are in: (1) the extensive videos and science-related materials on the website for the Nobel Prize ( http://www.nobelprize.org ), (2) the diverse topics  covered by Popular Science magazine ( http://www.popsci.com ), and (3) the “News” sections of the weekly journals, Sciencehttp://sciencemag.org )  and Naturehttp://www.nature.com/news/index.html ).   At any of these websites, you can enter your subject into the site-search box and a list of available materials will be displayed; some of these will include coverage about the activities of specific scientists.  With luck, you will spot something that is quite new and interesting. Once you find a few names, you can look on the internet to see if those scientists have a website of their own; many modern university scientists do this, and include public information about all their research activities and projects.

A required postscript about Wiki’s

In my opinion, Wiki websites are a very useful starting point when utilized as outlined above.  They certainly are quick and easy, but they do not always present a complete account, are known sometimes to give only approved or politically correct information, and occasionally deliver a biased or truncated coverage. Hence, you must be aware that you can be given info that is incomplete or less than totally true.  If you ever need to quote something from a Wiki report, then it is necessary that you find and check the original source(s) listed and cite only those.  Once, I found a most unexpected statement in a Wiki presented as a fact about a public figure I know, so I checked their referenced source and found that it said nothing at all about this peculiar statement; thus, the citation was either a mistake or a false reference, and this statement probably is not true.



                                                            UNDER THE WEBSITE TITLE